undefined | Better HN

0 pointsspaghetti13y ago0 comments

The only bridges that were burned were from the candidate to the company. In other words the company made the mistake. Not the candidate.

Having a blanket policy on not walking out of interviews is ridiculous. The manner in which one walks out makes all the difference. The rockstar you mentioned probably walked out the wrong way. Namely sulking, pouting and not saying anything. The right way is to be polite, clear and concise. It's exactly what the company does when they think it's not working out.

Think about this from an employer's perspective. Someone cutting the interview short actually piques my interest. This is especially true if they pass all the technical interviews. I'd probably follow-up with them and see if they were interested in contract or part-time work. On the other hand I don't look too highly upon candidates that just sit through all the interviews by default. I want someone who will speak up, be confident etc.

0 pointsspaghetti13y ago0 comments

The only bridges that were burned were from the candidate to the company. In other words the company made the mistake. Not the candidate.

0 comments

4 comments · 2 top-level

jakejake13y ago· 2 in thread

I like programmers who are smart and bring their inventive ideas to the company. That may include some healthy arguments at times as well. That's not the same as somebody who's constantly combative and seems to have no clue that we need to keep the company running in order to continue receiving paychecks. The later is also the type of person who rudely walks out on an interview. No thanks.

slurgfest13y ago

You have broken the world into two groups: healthy arguments and constantly combative. But there is no hard criterion to separate the two. And you spuriously assign anyone to 'constantly combative' who cuts an interview short, when this doesn't at all mean that someone has no clue and likes fighting for no reason.

So consider the possibility that you are assigning people to 'constantly combative' when you simply don't like their smart and inventive ideas and healthy arguments. Perhaps one healthy argument too far hurts your ego and becomes 'constant combat' without being any less healthy in reality.

That incentive structure is all it takes to make a whole dept. or whole company act in an essentially delusional and inwardly-focused way.

jakejake13y ago

I think it's more that I just don't like assholes.

Timothee13y ago

Your comment made me think of this point: it's not uncommon for companies to ask to be prepared for a full day of interviews but based on how the early interviews go, you get more or less interviews at the end of the day.

This is no different but reversed in "favor" of the candidate.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse