undefined | Better HN

0 pointsaccount429mo ago0 comments

webm or any other non-gimped video codec would be a much better format for that use case. Unfortunately browsers don't allow those in image contexts so we are stuck with an inferior "state of the art" literally-webm-with-deliberately-worse-compression webp standard.

AVIF is only starting to become widespread so can't be used without fallback if you care about your users. Not sure how it compares to AV1 quality/compression wise but hopefully its not as gimped as webp and there will encoders that aren't as crap as libwebp that almost everyone uses.

0 comments

chithanh9mo ago

> Unfortunately browsers don't allow those in image contexts

The fact that we have the <img> element at all is bad. HTML has since the early days a perfectly capable <object> which can even be nested to provide fallback, but browser support was always spotty.

The Acid2 test famously used <object> to shame browser vendors into supporting it at least to some extent.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsaccount429mo ago0 comments

0 comments

chithanh9mo ago

> Unfortunately browsers don't allow those in image contexts

The fact that we have the <img> element at all is bad. HTML has since the early days a perfectly capable <object> which can even be nested to provide fallback, but browser support was always spotty.

The Acid2 test famously used <object> to shame browser vendors into supporting it at least to some extent.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse