undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmmooss9mo ago0 comments

> It's not an attempt to spin the lawsuit; it's about reassuring their customers.

It can be both. It clearly spins the lawsuit - it doesn't present the NYT's side at all.

0 comments

It would be extremely unusual (and likely very stupid) for the defendant in a lawsuit to post publicly that the plaintiff maybe has a point.

Why does OpenAI have any obligation to present the NYTs side?

mmoossOP9mo ago

Who said 'obligation'?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsmmooss9mo ago0 comments

> It's not an attempt to spin the lawsuit; it's about reassuring their customers.

It can be both. It clearly spins the lawsuit - it doesn't present the NYT's side at all.

It would be extremely unusual (and likely very stupid) for the defendant in a lawsuit to post publicly that the plaintiff maybe has a point.

Why does OpenAI have any obligation to present the NYTs side?

mmoossOP9mo ago

Who said 'obligation'?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse