Having a cheaper, more available resource increases overall utilization of that resource.
Because it's easy to just drift along with the tide. Even bacteria follow those "economic" laws with regards to replication, food/energy, competition and so on. It takes no effort. And the only thing that keeps bacteria in check is that there is someone above them, limiting them.
We want to be on top, but we don't act with the according responsibility. We can learn this lesson through misery and pain. But this is also how bacteria learn. It'd be sad if we can't do better.
Notice all multicellular organisms exist through their cells implementing such restraint. Cells restrain themselves on function (gene expression) and on replication. When they stop doing that, they revert to pre-organism behavior, and we call it cancer.
We call ourselves a society, but we're only experiencing brief flashes of what this means. Insects like ants and bees are literally better at it, than we are. Lots of work to be done...
I have similar thoughts relating to hive mind vs independent societies or progression under autocratic vs democratic societies.
The collective that can organize fully towards a goal is going to beat a collective that can't, or takes steps backwards every 4 years.
A stable system has fractal stability as you go deeper. You can't make a car go faster than its parts can withstand before they fall apart. Even if you press the pedal really strongly.
Democracy is indeed a compromise - we cripple synchronization at a macro level, so that we get to enjoy some individual freedoms. But it also results in hidden structures of control, like corporations growing so large within a "free market" that they start buying power, and this feeds a cycle of autocracy that is even more toxic than the ideological kind, as it's entirely driven by the profit motive.
So essentially, we first need to escape the false dichotomy of autocracy vs democracy and think what transcendent paradigm includes positive elements of both, and some novel ones, but it includes less drawbacks from each. And I think we can mine nature and software architectures for inspiration, as they're rich with working models we haven't even tried yet at a social level.
But I don't think we're moving towards that. We just wobble between anarchy and fascism and somewhere in the middle is what we call "normal" (but ain't).
