> It's like chess. Humans are better for now, they won't be forever

This is not an obviously true statement. There needs to be proof that there are no limiting factors that are computationally impossible to overcome. It's like watching a growing child, grow from 3 feet to 4 feet, and then saying "soon, this child will be the tallest person alive."

The time where humans + computers in chess were better than just computers was not a long time. That era ended well over a decade ago. Might have been true for only 3-5 years.

No guarantee that will happen. LLMs are still statistically based. It's not going to give you edgier ideas, like filling a glass of wine to the rim.

Use them for the 90% of your repetitive uncreative work. The last 10% is up to you.

What do you mean? Chess engines are incredibly far ahead of humans right now.

Even a moderately powered machine running stockfish will destroy human super gms.

Sorry, after reading replies to this post i think I've misunderstood what you meant :)

its not like chess

Your information is quite badly out of date. AI can now beat humans at not only chess but 99% of all intellectual exercises.