> All you're doing here is endorsing sophistry over knowledge.
What? First, sophistry, has little to do with anything I wrote. Second, I'm most certainly endorsing knowledge.
> There's a place for logic and there's a place for facts.
Really? Do you have little slots for them on your spice rack? Logic and facts are the fabric of reality. This a comment I'd expect from someone desperately wanting to be right despite being pathologically wrong.
> Focusing on one over the other leads to persons being so "open-minded" that their brain falls out.
How was I focusing on one? Logic and facts are complimentary, and even if you somehow exclusively focused on one, how would that lead to extreme open-mindedness? And how is being open-minded bad? (You are also misusing the "being so open-minded their brain falls out" quote which is meant to meant to convey that you should be open-minded [good] but not foolishly accepting of poorly formulated ideas [bad]) What do you even mean by this comment? It is nonsense.
I think you read my comment, self identify as a hipster or "bullshitter", had an emotional response of wanting to retort and instead wrote a post that illustrated one of my points.
No comments yet.
