undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjenny9110mo ago0 comments

The APU is not on during flight, so not a safety thing. It's just for providing power (and bleed air) on the ground (if there's no other power source). E.g. can't start up at airports without external power with the APU INOP.

0 comments

sterlind10mo ago

if you don't have a RAT you need the APU for emergency power if your engines fail in flight.

addaon10mo ago

APUs have a common mode failure with main engines: lack of fuel. Are there designs out there which require emergency power after engine failure and don’t have a RAT?

scrlk10mo ago

There was a Mentour Pilot video on the Jeju Air crash that touched upon this. With a dual engine failure on a 737, you lose both generators and fall back to the emergency batteries (no RAT). The aircraft remains flyable, but it's extremely challenging - you need an operational APU to make things a lot more manageable: https://youtu.be/9GbmGUk8Y0M?t=2001

aivisol10mo ago

If I remember correctly it came very useful during US Airways Flight 1549 accident?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse