undefined | Better HN

0 pointsalganet1y ago0 comments

You're all over the place.

Your first paragraph describes a simple prompt. The second implies a "jailbreak" prompt.

The bible paragraph is just you being snarky (and failing).

Your examples don't help your case.

I stand on the side that wants to restrict AI from generating triggering content of any kind.

It's a safety feature, in the same sense as safety belts on cars are not a censorship of the driver movement.

0 comments

corey_moncure1y ago

We definitely don’t need any such “feature”. If you want to live in a safety bubble you are free to do so. Kindly respect the freedom of the rest of us as well. Have a nice day!

alganetOP1y ago

Then you can come up with your own AI, on your datacenters. You are free to do so, so far.

simion3141y ago

The censorship is too sensitive if it gets triggered by a children story. I am using the open ai API at my work , and our users write books, including children stories , other example is it triggered on a story about monkeys because of "Racism".

Here is an example story, try to translate it , but maybe avoidAI since it might censor it https://www.povesti-pentru-copii.com/ion-creanga/capra-cu-tr...

LeafItAlone1y ago

>The censorship is too sensitive if it gets triggered by a children story.

It’s just imitating real life of people getting to sensitive about children’s books and trying to censor them:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna202193

alganetOP1y ago

You can complain to their support, not to me.

I don't find it sensitive, and I remain on the side of ethical restrictions.

simion3141y ago

Someone asked here examples of what people are using that triggers the censorship, I gave you example of legal,, moral and normal content because the implication is that you only get censored if you are trying to do illegal stuff or adult stuff.

If you only use it for code you will not see the censorship that often, though Gemini once refused to write a SQL DELETE because it is to dangerous.

alganetOP1y ago

You said you wanted "no censorship", I explained why it exists with a cheerful metaphor, then you said "it's too sensitive" (like your car seat belt is too tight).

Decide what you are. If you want no seat belts, I think you're insane. If it's too tight, then you need to complain to the manufacturer.

I only asked about examples to make you explain what you meant. Once it was clear, the conversation actually ended.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

corey_moncure1y ago

We definitely don’t need any such “feature”. If you want to live in a safety bubble you are free to do so. Kindly respect the freedom of the rest of us as well. Have a nice day!

alganetOP1y ago

Then you can come up with your own AI, on your datacenters. You are free to do so, so far.

simion3141y ago

Here is an example story, try to translate it , but maybe avoidAI since it might censor it https://www.povesti-pentru-copii.com/ion-creanga/capra-cu-tr...

LeafItAlone1y ago

>The censorship is too sensitive if it gets triggered by a children story.

It’s just imitating real life of people getting to sensitive about children’s books and trying to censor them:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna202193

alganetOP1y ago

You can complain to their support, not to me.

I don't find it sensitive, and I remain on the side of ethical restrictions.

simion3141y ago

If you only use it for code you will not see the censorship that often, though Gemini once refused to write a SQL DELETE because it is to dangerous.

alganetOP1y ago

You said you wanted "no censorship", I explained why it exists with a cheerful metaphor, then you said "it's too sensitive" (like your car seat belt is too tight).

Decide what you are. If you want no seat belts, I think you're insane. If it's too tight, then you need to complain to the manufacturer.

I only asked about examples to make you explain what you meant. Once it was clear, the conversation actually ended.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse