Which, if anyone were honest here, most would admit that they suspect that was the intent. You can't cheer on the judges who do this sort of thing as heroes upholding democracy in one thread, and turn around and in another say "well, they weren't even deliberately doing it, they're just following rules".

Can we prove the judge was acting in bad faith? I don't think that's very likely. But I'd be shocked if that wasn't really what was going on.

We're all being manipulated, you know. I still see 3 headlines a day about the "Maryland man", who isn't from Maryland.

>A bunch of ICE agents sitting in the gallery could definitely be interpreted as disruptive.

Sure, some could claim that. But I doubt they were hooting and hollering and pointing at the man, making intimidating gestures.

>If ICE was going to arrest this person in the middle of a courtroom,

Some here would claim that, but this is unlikely. They'd have waited for the proceeding to end, and followed him out the door. It still accomplishes what they want without pissing off a judge that they might need civility from next week or next year. If you're imagining they're causing trouble that won't help them accomplish what they want to accomplish simple for the sake of causing trouble and making Trump look bad... well, then what can I say?

>Police are not allowed to walk in and arrest defendants in the middle of court.

No one needs to do that. Those same police you're talking about wait until it's over, and arrest them in the hallway outside the courtroom. And they are allowed to do that. But then, most judges don't have soft spot for those criminals like they do for illegal immigrants.