Show HN: An MCP server for understanding AWS costs

119 pointsStratusBen11mo ago23 comments

Hey all - I work at Vantage, a FinOps platform.

I know AI is peak hype right now. But it has definitely changed some of our dev workflows already. So we wanted to find a way to let our customers experiment with how they can use AI to make their cloud cost management work more productive.

The MCP Server acts as a connector between LLMs (right now only Claude, Cursor support it but ChatGPT and Google Gemini coming soon) and your cost and usage data on Vantage which supports 20+ cloud infra providers including AWS, Datadog, Mongo, etc. (You have to have a Vantage account to use it since it's using the Vantage API)

Video demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0VP2NlUvRU

Repo: https://github.com/vantage-sh/vantage-mcp-server

It's really impressive how capable the latest-gen models are with an MCP server and an API. So far we have found it useful for:

Ad-Hoc questions: "What's our non-prod cloud spend per engineer if we have 25 engineers"

Action plans: "Find unallocated spend and look for clues how it should be tagged"

Multi-tool workflows: "Find recent cost spikes that look like they could have come from eng changes and look for GitHub PR's merged around the same time" (using it in combination with the GitHub MCP)

Thought I'd share, let me know if you have questions.

23 comments

ponywombat11mo ago

AWS have also made their own cost analysis MCP server https://github.com/awslabs/mcp/tree/main/src/cost-analysis-m...

neuroelectron11mo ago

What a great solution. They can leverage this to avoid liability for their own price quotes and solutions while simultaneously adding another layer of vender lock-in. synergy

cowsandmilk11mo ago

How does this avoid liability for anything?

2 more replies

mdaniel11mo ago

How does this work? https://github.com/vantage-sh/vantage-mcp-server?tab=License...

That is extra weird when thinking about the audience who might be Vantage.sh users (and thus have the ability to create the read-only token mentioned elsewhere) but would almost certainly be using it from their workstation, in a commercial context. Sounds like you're trying to keep someone from selling your MCP toy and decided to be cute with the licensing text

bluck11mo ago

I'm just trying to understand licenses, but doesn't the choice of MIT contradict the inital "non-commercial purposes" as MIT says 'including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software' - Therefore, the non-commercial purposes is actually void and I can use the software to the limits of MIT defines? And because it is already MIT, they can relicense only future software but not this piece anymore?

skwashd11mo ago

IANAL but that is my understanding. I created an issue to get some clarification - https://github.com/vantage-sh/vantage-mcp-server/issues/31

1 more reply

ddingus11mo ago

You have a couple problems that I can see:

One is the MIT license does not prohibit selling. And wrapping it in a "for non-commercial uses" clause creates a contradiction difficult, if not impossible to enforce.

globalise8311mo ago

So if I want to use the software I just have to create a fork on my home machine for non-commercial purposes, update the license to MIT only, and then the fork is mine to do with as I want commercially? What's even the point of this license?

_pdp_11mo ago

On a related note, I'm not sure when it became "ok" to leave production credentials scattered across your system in configuration files. So many MCP server examples encourage this pattern, and inevitably, it's going to cause trouble at some point.

Game_Ender11mo ago

What is your preferred way to manage them?

devenjarvis11mo ago

The 1pass CLI is great! However if you aren’t using 1password as your secrets vault, I’m building an open source, vault-agnostic alternative called RunSecret (https://github.com/runsecret/rsec)

1 more reply

nel-vantage11mo ago

Vantage engineer who worked on this feature here. The security posture of MCP servers is still in its early stages (see “The ‘S’ in MCP Stands for Security” from three weeks ago [https://elenacross7.medium.com/%EF%B8%8F-the-s-in-mcp-stands...]). The recommendations above to use something like the 1Password CLI wrapper when invoking an MCP server seem sound.

That being said, an easier-to-distribute user experience would be to leverage short-lived OAuth tokens that LLM clients such as Claude or Goose ultimately manage for the user. We’re exploring these avenues as we develop the server.

klooney10mo ago

If your service is running in AWS, use the native IAM identity loading from ECS, EKS, EC2, etc. If it's your laptop, set AWS_PROFILE and let the SDK load the temporary creds from ~/.aws.

If you really really really need to use static creds on your laptop, use aws-vault to export them, or ephemeral creds generated from them, into your environment.

ivanvanderbyl11mo ago

1Password’s CLI op does a reasonably good job of this

andrenotgiant11mo ago

What's the difference between connecting an LLM to the data through Vantage vs directly to the AWS cost and usage API's?

StratusBenOP11mo ago

A few things.

The biggest is giving the LLM context. On Vantage we have a primitive called a "Cost Report" that you can think of as being a set of filters. So you can create a cost report for a particular environment (production vs staging) or by service (front-end service vs back-end service). When you ask questions to the LLM, it will take the context into account versus just looking at all of the raw usage in your account.

Most of our customers will create these filters, define reports, and organize them into folders and the LLM takes that context into account which can be helpful for asking questions.

Lastly, we support more providers beyond AWS so if you wanted to merge in other associated costs like Datadog, Temporal, Clickhouse, etc.

cat-whisperer11mo ago

This is going to different, as resources end up getting intertwined? or is there a way to standardize it?

salynchnew10mo ago

This is dangrous, as I've long held that inscrutible cloud billing was one of the greatest protections we had against a runaway superintelligent AI.

Now we only have poor IAM UX to fall back on.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

Show HN: An MCP server for understanding AWS costs

119 pointsStratusBen11mo ago23 comments

Hey all - I work at Vantage, a FinOps platform.

Video demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0VP2NlUvRU

Repo: https://github.com/vantage-sh/vantage-mcp-server

It's really impressive how capable the latest-gen models are with an MCP server and an API. So far we have found it useful for:

Ad-Hoc questions: "What's our non-prod cloud spend per engineer if we have 25 engineers"

Action plans: "Find unallocated spend and look for clues how it should be tagged"

Multi-tool workflows: "Find recent cost spikes that look like they could have come from eng changes and look for GitHub PR's merged around the same time" (using it in combination with the GitHub MCP)

Thought I'd share, let me know if you have questions.

23 comments

ponywombat11mo ago

AWS have also made their own cost analysis MCP server https://github.com/awslabs/mcp/tree/main/src/cost-analysis-m...

neuroelectron11mo ago

What a great solution. They can leverage this to avoid liability for their own price quotes and solutions while simultaneously adding another layer of vender lock-in. synergy

cowsandmilk11mo ago

How does this avoid liability for anything?

2 more replies

mdaniel11mo ago

How does this work? https://github.com/vantage-sh/vantage-mcp-server?tab=License...

bluck11mo ago

skwashd11mo ago

IANAL but that is my understanding. I created an issue to get some clarification - https://github.com/vantage-sh/vantage-mcp-server/issues/31

1 more reply

ddingus11mo ago

You have a couple problems that I can see:

One is the MIT license does not prohibit selling. And wrapping it in a "for non-commercial uses" clause creates a contradiction difficult, if not impossible to enforce.

globalise8311mo ago

_pdp_11mo ago

Game_Ender11mo ago

What is your preferred way to manage them?

devenjarvis11mo ago

The 1pass CLI is great! However if you aren’t using 1password as your secrets vault, I’m building an open source, vault-agnostic alternative called RunSecret (https://github.com/runsecret/rsec)

1 more reply

nel-vantage11mo ago

klooney10mo ago

If your service is running in AWS, use the native IAM identity loading from ECS, EKS, EC2, etc. If it's your laptop, set AWS_PROFILE and let the SDK load the temporary creds from ~/.aws.

If you really really really need to use static creds on your laptop, use aws-vault to export them, or ephemeral creds generated from them, into your environment.

ivanvanderbyl11mo ago

1Password’s CLI op does a reasonably good job of this

andrenotgiant11mo ago

What's the difference between connecting an LLM to the data through Vantage vs directly to the AWS cost and usage API's?

StratusBenOP11mo ago

A few things.

Most of our customers will create these filters, define reports, and organize them into folders and the LLM takes that context into account which can be helpful for asking questions.

Lastly, we support more providers beyond AWS so if you wanted to merge in other associated costs like Datadog, Temporal, Clickhouse, etc.

cat-whisperer11mo ago

This is going to different, as resources end up getting intertwined? or is there a way to standardize it?

salynchnew10mo ago

This is dangrous, as I've long held that inscrutible cloud billing was one of the greatest protections we had against a runaway superintelligent AI.

Now we only have poor IAM UX to fall back on.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse