As the paper describes, the stickers can be applied "in any pattern so long as some tape is visible from every position that the device will move to". Thus, there is no need to align the stickers in a special pattern beforehand.
Anyone should be able to print similar calibration stickers on their own dime.
The only issue I can see is kick-back from the router bit, especially if you use larger diameter bits - this can throw the router significantly, and unless the control system compensates quickly yet gently, you may well lose tracking, leading to undefined results.
Oh my, one more video I cannot watch just because I am german and one more day of my life ruined by them :(
Observations from the video:
1) On the screen is a picture of the object, with a blue path representing the actual path of the router and a circle representing the fault tolerance of the system. Apparently, keep the path inside of the circle and you win.
2) The computer can move the router independently of its mount, within the tolerance represented by the onscreen circle.
3) It looks really easy to operate.
Hint: Use a (free) youtube proxy ...
Like this: http://www.ssyoutube.com/watch?v=-UmL7xZZSUk (remove the 'feature=player_embedded&' crap after copying the link to your url bar)
The great thing about this is: no extra software needed (though there is an extension and an bookmarklet) and it gives you links to all video resolutions. Proxtube didn't work for me when I tried it and most of the time I like to download the videos with a download manager, which speeds things up on my slow connection (though the Flash Player seems to have gotten faster on my netbook, both download and playback-wise.
Further, the amount of movement would not make your routes completely useless/wildly inaccurate.
Given the right price, almost every woodworker on the planet would likely buy this.
They mention the precision is 0.009" average error, which is good enough for woodworking, but not say, metalworking, or even any kind of precision plastic parts.
They also mention "digital automation" in general, which this wouldn't replace. Cabinet shops/etc use CNC machines not just because they are accurate, repeatable, etc, but because they do not require humans to baby them.
Overall a cool new application - I find the display on the screen one of the best features, and, in fact, I'd kill to have something like that -without- the motor correction. One could, with some work, replace the motors with encoders attached to spinning shafts, which were limited in which direction they could spin, and get rid of the tape - simply showing the user that they are following the pattern or not.