undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdoublerabbit0y ago0 comments

> Given that everyone has different definitions of "bad" and that someone malicious can put bad stuff on "good" sites, no.

Kagi allowing you to assign what is good and bad makes your argument void.

> So the main question that I have is, is there a guarantee that bad sites will not show up here?

You shouldn't rely on the company alone. While it may be what Kagi is aiming for but they can only do so much.

If you're concerned for your kids you too should always double check if the content is good/bad regularly.

0 comments

>"That's what Kagi is aiming for but they can only do so much."

Not sure why my argument is void, but you restating my exact point with different words is valid?

Are you expecting a company to manage it completely without human intervention, yourself without verifying the results?

If so, you then got to expect what Kagi decides what is bad and what is good and accept that's it.

It could be bias it could be not. I like to think they know but I personally would never put all my eggs in one basket.

>Are you expecting a company to manage it completely without human intervention, yourself without verifying the results?

What?

Parent commenter asked if it was guaranteed to block the bad stuff. I answered no. That's the entire conversation summarized.

Then you came in, said I was wrong, and then answered the question with "no", just like I did.

I didn't say anything about my expectations, or what I would do, or how I do it.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse