undefined | Better HN

Skip to content

Top Best Ask Show New Jobs

0 pointsDrammBA1y ago0 comments

Every change really does break someone's workflow https://xkcd.com/1172/

Counter-argument against exempting the demo page: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43237672

0 comments

6 comments · 3 top-level

geor9e1y ago· 2 in thread

At a certain point, one must take responsibility for clicking "a scroll bar buddy that walks down the page when you scroll" and then being faced with exactly what it said.

"Dead dove, do not eat" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUKmq7UMJys

DrammBAOP1y ago

I agree that preferring reduced motion and then visiting a site whose sole purpose is presenting motion is an interesting choice, but I don't think the CSS Working Group or web developers in general are in any position to question it.

hello123432141y ago· 1 in thread

I like that cartoon. much care and thought should be taken when implementing changes that affect users :)

DeepSeaTortoise1y ago

I really wish there was a separate category for "short and funny" xkcds.

Some of them are incredibly hilarious, but the author is just way too productive.

crabmusket1y ago

> Counter-argument against exempting the demo page

I really don't think that's a counter-argument for exempting the demo. It's an argument against ever implementing this feature on an actual website. Or, an argument for using the prefers-reduced-motion check on an actual website.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse