They excuse Trump's immorality because they don't see it as immorality. They might talk about it in those terms, but that's just because they know that things like having sex with a porn star while married is generally considered wrong. It's not actually used as part of the evaluation of how good or bad a person is.
So you're saying that because they accept Trump as their leader, therefore whatever he does is "moral", regardless of what former "morality standards" they might have had? (I brought up Judeo-Christian because that's where traditionally American moral standards have come from, the 10 Commandments and all.) Or are you saying that all along their moral standards have been "to the strongest" (more Darwinistic in nature).
For them, deep state Marxism and expensive gas is a moral failing as well.
If you think taxes are theft, then that makes politicians morally bankrupt.
Would you pick a cop with a history of sexual assault, or one that robs you?