undefined | Better HN

0 pointscrazygringo1y ago0 comments

I have never heard a serious argument that it is more efficient to sell and reinvest from a finance perspective.

The argument is generally that private companies are more productive than public services due to productivity improvements that are forced via competition. There's no such forcing function for a government-provided service, enabling (potential) waste and bloat, depending on governmental competence and oversight.

The correct counter-argument is that there needs to be competition for that to happen. If you have only one electric utility for customers to choose from, the argument is totally invalidated.

0 comments

Affric1y ago

Here’s [1] a report from the early days of electricity privatisation in NSW. In all honesty it’s been about a decade since I have read it closely but I would say it’s fairly serious and it does like efficiency as a metric.

Underproductive though is certainly simpler but my understanding is that it was inefficient because the asset owner charging an equilibrium price should in theory lead to higher overall production (obviously lack of competition hurts this).

[1] https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/researchpapers/Documents/e...

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse