undefined | Better HN

0 pointsonli1y ago0 comments

There is a screenshot in the article of the appeal, confirming 1 and 2. Three follows logically.

0 comments

loeg1y ago

No, this doesn't show (2). It shows that Distrowatch specifically was considered malware -- not Linux in general.

To be fair, the screenshots are data points, but more would be needed to support the generalization being made.

Confirms that one time, one moderator labeled it that, not that "Facebook decided" it.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

loeg1y ago

No, this doesn't show (2). It shows that Distrowatch specifically was considered malware -- not Linux in general.

To be fair, the screenshots are data points, but more would be needed to support the generalization being made.

Confirms that one time, one moderator labeled it that, not that "Facebook decided" it.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse