You have to do that research yourself, that isn't a question answered within HN's character limit. But Bernie's popularity along the youth probably was not just some trend, to help you start.
we literally just had a referendum on that. moving further left from 2016-2020-2024 lost voters. how pissed off do people have to be to have that result? that implies, very strongly, to me that there is a huge segment in the center-left to center-right that is really irritated right now. not bernie's group for sure. although he seems more center compared to the "squad". you should thank them for that.
Also, it's hard to imagine a centrist Dem voting for Trump in any circumstances.
No, it continued the 30 year trend since Hw Bush. Right to left to right.
It only really hints that people only rile up after the other party leaves office. So I guess "pissed off enough to be mildly annoying but not so pissed off to overcome an incumbent". But yes, the center is riled up, a little. The right moreso. Someone on the fringes is never not going to vote to begin with, so that's a bad way to judge those groups.
>not bernie's group for sure. although he seems more center compared to the "squad". you should thank them for that.
Really depends on your lens. For the EU, US is basically center right even with liberals. So Bernie would be a proper left wing candidate.
But for US, that's about as liberal as we've been for decades. Decades of red scare narrative made many across the board hate the idea of "socialist ideals" like Universal healthcare and publicly owned utilities. It seems that's starting to crack,maybe.
> You have to do that research yourself
It's really on you or whoever is making the claim.
> that isn't a question answered within HN's character limit
It seems pretty straightforward to me. Who voted for what and why?
If you don't know, then these claims are fabrications.
Yes, thats the hard part. Lots of reach if varying quality and accuracy, before and after election analysis. Opinion pieces. So much to sift through.
>It's really on you or whoever is making the claim.
I didn't make the claim. But I want to emphasize that this isn't just a question you throw a link at.
>If you don't know, then these claims are fabrications.
If that's your approach to any social science, you're not getting far. Nro unless you have the money for a census with proper statisticians. Data will always be messy and debatable.
>It seems pretty straightforward to me. Who voted for what and why?
I hope the above at least sheds some light otherwise. At least if your goal is truly truth seeking and not randomly bashing heads on the internet.
you know, the existence of which just changed the course of the latest election...
whatever the relative left-ness of those choices where, it was obviously so much so too far left for about 2million+ people who, to be gracious, decided to hold their noses.
so i'm left completely flumoxed why it's not blindingly obvious. at least at this point in time, those candidates' platforms seriously missed the mark. if those folks that were centrist-ish enough to even consider "holding their noses" to vote for trump, i can't imagine how they'd be supportive of anything even further to the left of the choices they had available and fairly rejected.
how would moving further left capture those voters? (those willing to vote trump, perhaps marginally)
i know it's not just right vs. left, but in this case all the other things seem to either be trump disadvanges (personality) or about the same for both of the two poles. nobody in the whole election seemed to be able to string a coherent sentence together, for example.
