undefined | Better HN

0 pointskjs31y ago0 comments

If you have to go to 1977 or prior to slag a language, there are tons of languages that will disappoint you.

0 comments

PL/I

pjmlp1y ago

I would assess C++ has already outpaced PL/I complexity, and I do enjoy using C++.

You can get a C++ compiler which is (more or less) correct, I'm not sure that was ever quite true of PL/I.

I think Programming Language One is the same type as Eureka Seven.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointskjs31y ago0 comments

If you have to go to 1977 or prior to slag a language, there are tons of languages that will disappoint you.

PL/I

pjmlp1y ago

I would assess C++ has already outpaced PL/I complexity, and I do enjoy using C++.

You can get a C++ compiler which is (more or less) correct, I'm not sure that was ever quite true of PL/I.

I think Programming Language One is the same type as Eureka Seven.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse