Expecting AGI to just spring forth from a box of inert electrical silicon-based switches is like expecting a hammer to start driving nails on it's own.
It's a modern form of alchemy --- expecting a fantastical result from trial and error with only limited understanding of the processes required.
That's the problem with intelligence. One day chess was considered a form of intelligence, that got solved by alpha-beta search and there was no longer a miracle.
Or is it that visual recognition models since YoLo are a miracle in the sense of practical image recognition?
So, yes OpenAI would make AGI available. They already did.
A: The word "intelligence" contains 11 letters: i-n-t-e-l-l-i-g-e-n-c-e.
Wrong! The correct answer is 12.
This is definitely not AGI! It is a crude statistical attempt that some people confuse with AGI.
>Show your work. Then generate a Jupyter notebook that performs the calculations so I can double check, provide a link to download it from my storage when complete.
>Answer: The total number of letters in the provided comment is 187.
>You can download the generated Jupyter notebook to review and verify the calculations using the link below:
>Download the Jupyter Notebook
https://chatgpt.com/share/6759dd5a-140c-8011-b132-5664f3aaa4...
I don’t know what AGI really means at this point, and I don’t think this is quite there, but this is an example of ChatGPT (4o) choosing the correct context (counting only alphabet characters not total character count), parsing the comment correctly (non-trivial given the usage of delimiters in both the prompt and comment and reference to counting letters in the comment not being interpreted as a part of the instructions), choosing the correct python tools, arriving at the correct answer, then generating and populating a working, downloadable, notebook to check the work. All in one reply.
It looks like you would need to continue the conversation from the link I provided then regenerate the prompt/reply to see the processing blocks and download the notebook.
