What we need is a mechanism to terminate these entities, in the same way that chemotherapy eliminates fast-dividing cancer cells that have lost their ability to self-terminate.
Also, I would like to understand what your metrics are. If you have the ability to post on this site, I will assume your income is at least an order of magnitude, possibly two, higher than someone in Chad or South Sudan. Should you lower your living standards to match them and if so, what would you do with the remainder of your income? What material effect would it have on anyone for you to do this?
These are serious questions and I’m not trying to make fun of you. I’m trying to understand you’re thinking. And to be clear about my bias, I want everyone to be wealthy.
I would say everyone has right to be wealthy.
They do have a right to the wealth they earned through their own ideas and efforts. I'm guessing you're a tankie though, so you likely disagree.
Bloomberg writes like its better to keep all the AI content in walled gardens that only the wealthy or elite can access in a downhill dump on the unaware.
How is it better to sell access than to just make it available to everybody?
Meanwhile, I'll be using local versions of Ollama and Qwen to experiment with my own agentic workflows and help me organize my life better.
That is a quote from Zuckerberg about the intended application. Nothing about open source in there. The intent is to have "creators" push their AI slop into your feed. If you are such a creator, well, sorry I don't want your slop in my feed.
Can he make money selling real ads with fake content to fake users? Is that the future?
