undefined | Better HN

0 pointsLASR1y ago0 comments

That's exactly it.

I've been peddling my vision of "AI automation" for the last several months to acquaintances of mine in various professional fields. In some cases, even building up prototypes and real-user testing. Invariably, none have really stuck.

This is not a technical problem that requires a technical solution. The problem is that it requires human behavior change.

In the context of AI automation, the promise is huge gains, but when you try to convince users / buyers, there is nothing wrong with their current solutions. Ie: There is no problem to solve. So essentially "why are you bothering me with this AI nonsense?"

Honestly, human behavior change might be the only real blocker to a world where AI automates most of the boring busy work currently done by people.

This approach essentially sidesteps the need to have effect a behavior change, at least in the short-term while AI can prove and solidify its value in the real-world.

0 comments

5 comments · 2 top-level

sdwr1y ago· 2 in thread

There's a huge huge gap between "coaxing what you want out of it" and "trusting it to perform flawlessly". Everybody on the planet would use #2, but #1 is just for enthusiasts.

AI is squarely #1. You can't trust it with your credit card to order groceries, or to budget and plan and book your vacation. People aren't picking up on AI because it isn't good enough yet to trust - you still have the burden of responsibility for the task.

dimitri-vs1y ago

Siri, Alexa and Amazon Dash illustrate this well. I remember everyones excitement and massive investment about these, and we all know how that turned out. I'm not sure how many times we'll need to relearn that unless an automation works >99% of the time AND fails predictably, people don't use it for anything meaningful.

Daniel_Van_Zant1y ago

I think there is a large pool of near minimum-wage white collar workers who wouldn't care about that difference when it comes to executing on their jobs. These are the folks who are already using VBScript, AutoHotKey, Excel wizardry, etc. to automate large parts of their job regardless of any risks and will continue to use these new tools for similar purposes.

Aeolun1y ago· 1 in thread

There’s nothing to gain for anyone there. Workers will lose their jobs, and managers will lose their reports.

bonoboTP1y ago

Of course, but they'll go bankrupt if they don't adapt. Just like mom&pop cornerstores disappeared or any other large scale automation. Loom, cars, automated checkout in supermarkets etc. There will be resistance but the market will play it out. Similarly how taxi companies have started making apps after Uber got successful or local restaurants reluctantly made websites and added themselves to Google maps.

Nobody likes to change a system where they already have their own little comfortable spot and figured it out and just want to seep in the lukewarm there until retirement. Fully understandable. But at least in the private sector this will not save them.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse