He made his point poorly, but ultimately it's about OSS projects making more money and not running on people's generosity until they get burnt out because they have to do the OSS work and their real job to pay the bills. That it's a single maintainer or a group of people that get rich is irrelevant, to the real issue and only got brough up because Matt was trying to be insulting, which as I said, was wrong.

> If at this point you think Matt is motivated by anything other than greed, you haven't been reading enough of what he's writing.

I think this is an instance of, in some aspects and theoretically, doing the right thing for the wrong reasons.