I don't disagree with that, but the comment I've replied to said they were stealing "what they had previously provided". The stuff "provided" was code shared under a GPL license.
Maybe it's a technicality, but the code is open source and you can do whatever you want it it, provided that you respect the GPL license.
There's a lot to criticise Matt for here, but you can't accuse him of stealing GPL code. Like, that's one of the points of that license.