You did no such thing. You just told me why you think that, based on nonsense woowoo about karma, rebirth, and spirits; that is not logic, and it is certainly not rational. You've given me zero reason to believe anything you say.

> but you won't find the evidence of this statement from me since I don't meditate

Then you shouldn't be speaking with authority on the matter; you clearly know nothing about it.

> the goals of meditation (no suffering, darkness/closing your eyes, stopping the flow of your mind/one-pointed concentration, letting external spirits come in or practicing compassion for them, abandoning oneself, not having any attachments, and practicing not to be reborn again).

You've clearly confused the practice of meditation with certain religions that use the practice as part of their woo woo nonsense.

Meditation isn't about any of that; meditation is simply about learning to control the tool that is your mind rather than letting it control you. It is the practice of awareness without the incessant chattering of the mind. It is about learning that you are not your thoughts, nor are you a slave to them. There's nothing mystical about it.

> Therefore I am asking you to go look at what really happens to people who practice meditation and then confirm how what they can see, how they behave, and what kind of problems they have, are different from some people in human history who really had opened their eyes completely.

I didn't ask you to give me homework, I ask for evidence that your claims about meditation are true. You've provided none. If you can't back up claims you make, don't make them.

> Science and philosophy are two sides of the same coin, and you can't recognize evidence until you can understand what it means.

No they are not. Science is a philosophy, one based on evidence and logic. None of which you have shown here.

> I regret that I couldn't have had a proper conversation with you.

I don't believe you do. I believe you regret being asked for evidence of your claims.