undefined | Better HN

0 pointsericd1y ago0 comments

Ahh that explains it, thanks. Seems like a potentially large problem given their strategy.

0 comments

They could use something like GCRAM[1] to double capacity if they had to...but it's not clear how much worse performance would be.

[1]https://raaam-tech.com/products/

nsteel1y ago

The performance doesn't look great (yet). See Fig. 7

https://www.eng.biu.ac.il/fishale/files/2020/12/A-1-Mbit-Ful...

phonon1y ago

Cerebras runs at 1.1 GHz[1], and this was a much earlier design on 16nm so it might be a good fit by now. Their TSMC 5 nm version is scheduled for early 2025.[2]

[1]https://cerebras.ai/blog/cerebras-architecture-deep-dive-fir...

[2]https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/raaam-signs-lead-licensee-fo...

nsteel1y ago

They'd have to quadruple their performance to be relevant in the market generally, here's to hoping.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

phonon1y ago

They could use something like GCRAM[1] to double capacity if they had to...but it's not clear how much worse performance would be.

[1]https://raaam-tech.com/products/

nsteel1y ago

The performance doesn't look great (yet). See Fig. 7

https://www.eng.biu.ac.il/fishale/files/2020/12/A-1-Mbit-Ful...

phonon1y ago

Cerebras runs at 1.1 GHz[1], and this was a much earlier design on 16nm so it might be a good fit by now. Their TSMC 5 nm version is scheduled for early 2025.[2]

[1]https://cerebras.ai/blog/cerebras-architecture-deep-dive-fir...

[2]https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/raaam-signs-lead-licensee-fo...

nsteel1y ago

They'd have to quadruple their performance to be relevant in the market generally, here's to hoping.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse