All the episodes are here:
Episode 1 - http://media.smh.com.au/technology/digital-dreamers/digital-...
Episode 2 - http://media.smh.com.au/technology/digital-dreamers/digital-...
Episode 3 - http://media.smh.com.au/technology/digital-dreamers/digital-...
Episode 4 - http://media.smh.com.au/technology/digital-dreamers/the-new-...
Episode 5 - http://media.smh.com.au/technology/digital-dreamers/milliona...
It seems to me that Australia has a unique problem. There is a massive brain drain of engineers & tech entrepreneurs moving to the US to start their own business (E3 Visas). These are American, not Australian companies.
* The current tax law is a nightmare for those AU startups wishing to dole out equity.
* Lack of talent, the majority of students have steered clear of tech disciplines in university after the dot-com bust, the effect of this is being felt now as engineering talent is needed.
* The government is not focused on the needs of startups preferring to invest heavily in pie in the sky ideas or just digging the dirt out of the ground. There is no decisive strategy from the opposition nor the current gov in power.
* Lack of funding. There are just not enough investors in Australia looking to fund in Australian tech startups.
The Australian startup scene is booming! Hopefully this series will highlight some of these issues so things can get even easier for new Australian companies.
The current tax law is a nightmare for those AU startups wishing to dole out equity.
100% true
Lack of talent, the majority of students have steered clear of tech disciplines in university after the dot-com bust, the effect of this is being felt now as engineering talent is needed.
There is talent around if you know where to look.
The government is not focused on the needs of startups preferring to invest heavily in pie in the sky ideas or just digging the dirt out of the ground. There is no decisive strategy from the opposition nor the current gov in power.
Mostly untrue. I've done work for two local startups in the last 18 months, and both received significant government help, to the point where my services were at least partially funded by gov programs. Yes, getting government help can be a slow process, but I doubt anyone would except anything else.
The Shoes of Prey guys spoke specially about this recently at the Google startup event in Sydney. They praised the tax concessions and other gov funding available to startups.
Lack of funding. There are just not enough investors in Australia looking to fund in Australian tech startups.
Mostly untrue. There are plenty of YC-Style accelerator programs giving seed funding, and a decent number of individual investors interested. The VC funds don't seem to be playing the same game as Silicon Valley VCs though (but then - Boston VCs aren't playing that same game either).
A local Australian startup I've done some work for raised a $2 million angle round recently[1] and didn't seem to have a lot of trouble with it.
[1] http://delimiter.com.au/2012/02/23/australian-web-2-0-start-...
Bollocks. There is a massive amount of self-promotional noise coming from a medium-sized group of people going over to the US, not all of whom are that much or a loss to Australia.
Certainly Australia has its problems. And moving to the Bay Area to start a startup is obviously a good idea from many parts of the world. That being said, having a bit of a whinge in the SMH about how lousy Australia is is a great way to get some free media coverage for your startup.
They have an entire agency devoted to commercialisation and so forth -- Innovation Australia[1].
The problem is that despite the flowery language, it still moves, quacks and shits like a government department[2].
[1] http://www.innovation.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx [2] http://chester.id.au/2012/04/05/on-communicating-with-the-co...
Don't expect or even hope for the Australian government to help anything.
Very much so in QLD from experience. I'm studying [software] engineering at the University of Queensland and they give seemingly all their attention towards mining and civil majors.
It's a good read, and to me it highlights just how difficult it is to get funding in Australia. To put it in perspective, they are a well established company with solid founders and a proven business model, and they still had a great deal of difficulty raising money.
Could you elaborate?
Anyways, the major problem is that shares and options are taxed like income at the time of issue, with no easy way to defer the tax bill. This makes it essentially untenable to hand out equity to employees. This then makes it a lot harder to employ people as a bootstrapped startup.
And the fault lies with the incubators/VCs who are pushing and pushing these startups/entrepreneurs to go to the US so they can exit profitably.
They are basically trading off the long term health of the industry for short term personal gain. They are a disgrace.
If I was being offered a multi-million dollar round of funding that I wasn't getting in Australia I would be a fool not to go.
Many who have gone in the past have promised to come back and give back to the startup scene where they came from.
Time will tell if they kept their promise...
8 companies from this year's Startmate batch incorporated in the US from day 1 (last year only 2 flipped up post incorporation).
Flightfox is in YC. Happy Inspector is in 500 startups. Scriptrock raised in the US. Ninjablocks went nuts on Kickstarter and also raised in the US. The other 4 I believe are either back in Australia or are heading back here, most of them also raised money in the US.
So why did they incorporate in the US instead of Australia? Because ONE company from Startmate 2011 raised in Australia (that'd be us), and even then most of our first round came from the US.
So the choice is either to run an incubator that results in no companies getting funded, OR you get them to a place where they can raise money and be successful, and last I checked that's the whole point of an incubator.
As far as VC's go, it makes literally no sense for a VC to be pushing their portfolio companies to the US were valuations are higher. All they'd be doing is making it more expensive for themselves to invest in future rounds. They're not that dumb.
There will continue to be no investment in startups in Australia until there is PROOF that investing in Australian startups isn't a dickhead investment. The best way to do that is to do everything you can to get these companies to be successful. These companies are doing great things in the US and it is ALREADY encouraging several (up to 6 that I know of) new funds to get started in Australia WITH substantial incentives from the Aus Govt.
This thread has turned into a discussion about startups in Australia in general and let me add some perspective as an Australian who now lives in the US (NYC).
Firstly, a disclaimer: I'm from Western Australia, specifically Perth. WA is different to most of the rest of the country (except maybe Queensland) in that it awash in the biggest resources boom probably ever. Iron ore and oil and gas primarily but others too (aluminium, nickel, etc). China is of course the largest buyer.
In many ways Perth, the capital of WA and a city of some 1.5 million, is a boom town and really two cities: the haves and the have nots.
The haves are in the resources game, directly or indirectly. The biggest indirect benefactor is construction. There is some $50B+ in infrastructure projects in the pipeline and prices paid for construction are just astronomical. This was worse in the housing boom (up to 2008) but is still bad.
My brother-in-law who manages construction projects (apartment buildings and so forth) says that to build a two storey brick-and-tile house is about $2,000+/m2 (roughly $200/sq ft). Single storey is still probably $1500. Apartments in West Perth (close to the business district but not much else going on) sell for over $10,000/m2).
The have nots are everyone else including software engineers.
Post-housing bubble and because of the high cost of entry to the market (you will not find a house in Perth cheaper than $250,000 period and I'm including rundown houses built 50+ years ago) and tighter lending practices by the banks (anecdotally, the wholesale cost of lending pre-bubble bursting was 20 basis points about the RBA rate, now 100+) rents are going through the roof.
A one bedroom apartment I rented in 2005 for $300/week is now $600+. There are far more extreme examples than this.
On top of this the cost of living is ridiculous. Food, utilities, you name it.
Basically if you aren't in the resources/construction game, you have experienced a drop in your real standard of living over the last 10 years. Commercial property is expensive. Everything is expensive.
One big problem Australia has (IMHO) is stamp duty. Stamp duty as it applies to most people is a state government tax on the sale or transfer of property. In the US instead you pay property tax (typically 1-1.5% of assessed value AFAIK). In Australia you might pay as much as 5% of the sale value in tax.
Now consider that a "normal" family home in Sydney or Perth might be $1 million. So if a family in Sydney wants to pick up and move to Perth they may be $80,000 in the hole (including agent fees and the like) before they even start... all for a job that might only pay $100-150k. This I believe really hurts labour market flexibility.
Through a combination of taxing property and not the transaction and lower overall property values, this is not a problem the US has.
I often joke to friends and family that it is cheaper for me to live in Manhattan than in Perth now.
This has several negatives when it comes to tech:
1. There is a strong incentive go to the US, Real standard of living is higher, jobs are more plentiful and so on;
2. The high cost of living makes bootstrapping a startup in Perth expensive and not very attractive. More broadly to varying degrees I believe this applies to a large part of urban Australia;
3. Perth at least has never really had a tech scene per se. The norm is for any sufficiently large company to headquarter itself in Sydney or Melbourne. The only exception are resource companies (Rio Tinto, BHP, Woodside Petroleum and the like); and
4. Because there is so much "easy money" floating around in resources it's just to justify a tech startup comparatively.
Plus there are usual reasons: Australia is far from everywhere (Europe, Australia, even Asia) and Perth is even further (it is I believe the most isolated capital city in the world and you need to go 3000 miles before you find another city above 100,000 people).
Startups don't start in a vacuum. There is an ecosystem that makes them thrive. Angel funding, VC, etc.
As far as regulation goes, I don't see any particular barrier here. Forming a company in Australia isn't cheap (~$1000 for a private company, more for a public). Financial regulation is much stricter such that operating in financial services is a difficult proposition because of regulatory burden. For example, I don't believe Mint.com could ever have started in Australia.
I largely discount the "lack" of government involvement. Businesses will grow and thrive largely independently of the government and it's not something the government tends to be good at encouraging anyway (just look at the whole Curt Schilling thing).
If I was going to do a startup today I'd go and hole up for 6-12 months somewhere cheap to get an MVP and then base myself somewhere with a decent tech scene, maybe NYC or Boston.
From what I read the housing market is just nuts in SF now. Attracting and, more importantly, retaining staff I imagine is difficult in the Valley now. So much so that I think I would skip it entirely.
Whatever the case, Australia would be pretty low down on my list.
Several things are killing Australian non-resource workers at the moment.
1. Dollar strength : used to be you could make software or movies in Australia at a decent discount to doing it in the US for roughly the same quality. Not any more. This is unikely to change anytime soon.
2. Hostile government : the current rhetoric is about 'tax the rich' and 'pay your fair share'. For now, it's mostly aimed at Mining and Banking companies, but the overall tone is very negative when it comes to creating wealth. Whatever your thoughts about this as a political strategy, it's not exactly conducive to attracting capital either domestically or internationally.
3. Extreme housing + other living costs. Just taking a family out for a modest meal can easily push a C-note when you're all done. Adding movies onto that is going to be a buck fifty. Moving cities for another job is pretty much out of the question unless you get a $100k bonus to do so.
The one good thing Australia has going for it is the health insurance side of things. A startup doesn't have to take out health insurance for it's employees - if it does, it doesn't cost the earth. Whatever risks one might take in signing up with a small company, healthcare isn't one of the issues.
Some US places like the Bay Area or Manhattan might have high rent, but other costs are much, much lower.
But the overriding fact is : you're more likely to meet Australian tech entrepreneurs at a USA conference than somewhere in Australia. Conferences and the like are dominated by enterprise employees and talk of starting new things is relatively rare.
Realise that just because you had some level success, it doesn't mean it was all because of you and that it's not fair to pay your dues - it is fair. Economic and social welfare policies that were enacted more than 20 years gave you the environment to thrive. Now its your time to give back to that system so we can give others in the future their chance too.
Perth is not that expensive if you're prepared to put up with a 40 minute commute (O horrors).
The town I grew up in, Darwin, is now regularly amongst the most expensive capitals in the world for rent. And food, petrol etc is a helluva lot more expensive there than it is here in Perth.
Getting investment in Perth is tricky though. Investors in Perth understand the mining lifecycle. If you see something interesting on a map, you can round up some geologists and drillers and raise $10 million in a few weeks. It's basically the Silicon Valley of mining.
But god help you if you want to launch a software business. There's one venture fund and so far they've invested in one (1) software venture -- and that was Filter Squad, after Discovr was successful.
All the Australian action is happening over east. And there's nothing much there either.
If I could up stumps, right now, and move to the US, I would.
There may only be one venture fund locally, but there are several around Australia that have invested in startups out of Perth.
Also, That one VC (Yuuwa for those playing along at home) have invested in companies other than Filter Squad (Agworld being one of them - very much a tech startup, despite focusing on very non-traditional web / mobile audiences).
Likewise, Yuuwa invested in a seed round pretty early in Filter Squad (I can't remember exactly when since I wasn't around at that point) - it was just their follow up that was a bit later.
Instead of raising capital, use early customers to fund the development.
One of the biggest advantages IMHO we have over other states in Australia (that I believe makes up for most of the distance factor) is the more relaxed atmosphere which is very conducive to, lacking a better description, "Getting shit done".
Rent is very high across the board, but more frustratingly getting houses is becoming harder and harder - When I was looking a while ago it was almost impossible to find a single bedroom apartment between Mosman Park and Mount Lawley (admittedly, a reasonably expensive area) for under $350, even if they were old, undermaintained places. The demand for them was significant (most viewings had a fair amount of people) - From the people I've talked to searching for places since, that demand has only gone up further - Driving the prices even higher.
With all of that said and done, Perth is finally getting into the swing of having a startup scene - over the last year and even more focused the last six months, there have been more and more startups popping up in Perth (not just as side projects, but as actual companies working full time on products) and there has been a surge of interested. We're still behind other Australian cities, but it is definitely ramping up in a noticeable way.
I was paying $200/week for a room in Darwin.
Darcy, can you email me?
One thing I've noticed is that people here tend to aim for services rather than products. You can make money a lot faster contracting for a big mining company than you can trying to develop a product, fund it, market it, and make profit off it.
I'd even go as far as to say it's cultural - we're less likely to take the risk - probably because the big reward (anything to do with the mining industry) is so low risk to begin with. You even see it in other sectors - for example musicians over here are more likely to try making a living in a related service (music teaching etc) with guaranteed income than "risk" investing in their own music and trying to get big selling a product.
Tempted to move to NYC now and follow your lead!
So in other words, it's exactly like the SF bay area except without the tech scene?
If this is true, it's evidence that Ford can't hire software engineers.
Just do a simple, back of a envelope style calculation. A typical car has about 25 electronic modules, ranging from simple seat beat controllers and complex controllers like engine management units and instrument clusters. Assuming that each modules have about 250K line of code, that would take it up to 6.25M line of code. That goes up if we start to consider high end cars like BMWs and Mercs.
Let's not forget about the development infrastructure around the code development, that is another story..
Also, embedded software doesn't / can't make use of existing libraries because of code size (but this is changing)
And of course you can't really compare PHP+JS+what else in Facebook with C+Java+Assembly of car embedded systems
But yeah, hardware companies don't know how to make software
"Ford’s 2005 models contain between two and three million lines of code. Current 2007/2008 vehicles have an average of six million lines of code. The company is expecting about 10 million lines of code in its vehicles in 2010." http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_sg/about_us/success...
Although it's an unfair comparison if you're counting all the dozens of subsystems in the car, mostly developed by third parties, but not counting the OS kernel, full MySQL source, libraries, etc. used by Facebook & Twitter.
The point I'm starting to get mad about is this BS about not having sales. I've worked with an Atlassian partner and, well, Atlassian huge partner network is their sales force.
And over the last year Atlassian itself has started hiring internal sales people too so please stop with this "no sales"