I'm wondering if anyone who understands Langlands program mathematics or Quantum Field Theory can opine on whether it's gibberish or makes real sense.
It seems interesting, however I have only a cursory understanding of Quantum Field Theory and don't know anything about the Langlands program.
After only skimming, it has too many bullet point list and too few formulas. Usually math and physics papers have a wall of text with some formulas in between.
For someone working in the are it should be fast. It's too far away from my are to skim and find the errors.
Anyway, the default for a preprint (or paper) in the trash bin. Unless it's recommended by someone I thrust or it's published in a serious journal, I'd just ignore it.
For a post in HN, I can take a 10 minute look and try to find something interesting to comment about it good or bad. But not more than 10 minutes unless there is good reason.
According to ChatGPT the paper makes sense to ChatGPT but isn't rigorous enough. Then if I put that into a feedback loop, it starts producing "more rigorous" output.
It's a little concerning so I decided to stop here. It seems it could produce a wall of mathematical text that would take a professional a year to read.
