People are talking about their experience in sensitive areas, and so restrictions on devices you can bring in/out is fairly typical.
(a) employees aren't allowed to have/use their own paper notebooks in the first place
(b) if they do, then, yes, the notebooks don't leave unless Security reviews (if removal is even allowed)
However, any number of such traditional approaches stop working when remote work is a thing.
Technologies are needed if a firm wishes to retain the same level of awareness of what's happening to its IP while allowing employee flexibility (which, hopefully, firms are learning they should strive to allow).
For a science/engineering firm, this sort of arrangement isn't uncommon, because stuff you do in the lab leads to customer deliverables.
Of course, people can also do things electronically, which they increasingly do.
It's odd to describe that as confiscation. A lab notebook belongs to the lab, not the researcher, this is understood by both parties. They may or may not have permission to leave the lab with it, but making personal copies of the pages would be espionage.
It's perfectly reasonable to want comparable properties in a paper-replacing device. I can see where you might find that jarring if you haven't been exposed to work conditions where it's normal and expected.
I one of the reasons is it's easier for a malignant actor to get access to notes without you knowing when it's electronic. At least with a paper notebook you can tell if it's missing.