Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
fhdsgbbcaA
1y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
As far as I can tell he’s provided an empty vessel with a smart-sounding, but undefined term, and this entire thread is people projecting their beliefs into that vessel.
Nearly none of these comments are grounded in his actual text.
0 comments
3 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
danielmarkbruce
1y ago
· 2 in thread
Then don't believe it. It's not some water tight argument he's making, it's not "law of physics" right.
fhdsgbbcaA
OP
1y ago
That’s the point we’re making here: there is no argument.
danielmarkbruce
1y ago
There is an argument, it's just a little vague and not the kind of thing which can be proved.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse