It's a blatant lie to call this a "vague and hand-wavey reference". The files are publicly available on the Intercept and the first page on Google search results - there is absolutely no vagueness here.
It's also a blatant lie to claim that "no one has time" to spend 10 seconds on a Google search to find the files and 5-10 minutes to sample them and see how many are related to domestic collection.
Your response clearly indicates that you have neither read the files nor have the intellectual honesty to admit that you haven't read them and don't want to because it'll refute your existing beliefs.
Future HN readers: notice how this user is unwilling to read documents that are the first page on a Google search for "Snowden files", and uses any excuse necessary to avoid doing so and deflect when called out. This is an excellent confirmation of my claim that the majority of the documents are unrelated to domestic collection.
