Edit: It's base 100 so my critique is unfair.
However, the graph would be much more informative if there were 10 or 20 years of data. It's unclear to me why Feb 1, 2020 is a good baseline to use.
Here's the graph for all job postings in the US: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IHLIDXUS Note all job postings were up in 2022 so if the point was about software in particular it should probably be normalised.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPUMN54151W200000000
This category is defined by the BLS as "establishments primarily engaged in providing expertise in the field of information technologies through one or more of the following activities: (1) writing, modifying, testing, and supporting software to meet the needs of a particular customer; (2) planning and designing computer systems that integrate computer hardware, software, and communication technologies; (3) on-site management and operation of clients' computer systems and/or data processing facilities; and (4) other professional and technical computer related advice and services."
- job titles change
- indeed search demand constant
- other platforms
- 2022 height of bubble
https://github.com/hiring-lab/job_postings_tracker/blob/mast...
And they do aggregate from other sources:
First it was CareerBuilder, then Monster, then Dice, and now Indeed is having its day in the sun too. I wonder if the emergence of GenAI in the past 2 years have accelerated the spamification of Indeed and thus its demise. I’ve posted there and within minutes get hundreds of AI-generated “candidates” with practically the same resume/CV.
what am i missing?
From their GitHub page: “The data in this repository are the percentage change in seasonally-adjusted job postings since February 1, 2020, using a seven-day trailing average.”