undefined | Better HN

0 pointsgroby_b1y ago0 comments

fwiw, hiring senior talent in SF works just fine. If you pay at the right pricing tier. SF is a decent city. It could definitely do better, it has issues, but if we all could stop pretending it's a post apocalyptic hellscape, that'd be nice.

Yes, you pay an SF premium. You pay a premium for most major cities, and the worse housing is, the higher the premium. But I'd bet moving to the South Bay isn't happening for that reason. SF pricing has a halo effect on the South Bay, and your savings will be minimal, if any. (I see little differences in South Bay and SF salaries, for larger companies)

What I'd wager precipitated the move is SF rents are stupidly high , and then you combine that with half the twitter offices being empty. If you believe loopt, San Jose office space is ~ half the cost of SF. Half the space, at half again cost - their real estate bill shrinks by 75%. And given that Twitters bill is likely ~$40M-50M/month, that's a good chunk of savings.

0 comments

nostrademons1y ago

South Bay & Peninsula housing is actually more expensive than SF, though you do get a bit more for your money. Compensation is often marginally higher as well, though most companies with offices in both have them in the same salary band.

hintymad1y ago

For senior engineers, I'd say opportunities weigh more than the difference in salary or even in overall package, unless the package correlates with the opportunities. I may complain about commute, but I'd still be happy to join an exciting startup in the city.

throwaway20371y ago

    > South Bay & Peninsula housing is actually more expensive than SF

Per square foot/meter? I find this hard to believe.

rconti1y ago

I mean, obviously it depends on what city you choose, but given that the article is specifically about X moving to Palo Alto....

San Francisco is $957/sqft median listing price [1]

Palo Alto is $1800/sqft median listing price. [2]

Hell, I live in Redwood City and the median is $996/sqft.

1. https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/San-Franci...

2. https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/Palo-Alto_...

1 more reply

perks_121y ago

> but if we all could stop pretending it's a post apocalyptic hellscape, that'd be nice.

I’m very much not in the Valley or even the U.S. but I’ve seen a lot of videos and photos of SF streets being littered, about homelessness, drug use, something called bopping. Isn’t this real, or is it far less common than those videos make it out to be? Interested to hear this from people in SF.

_acco1y ago

There are a few very bad neighborhoods and the videos you are seeing accurately depict them. Most unfortunately, those bad parts are mixed into downtown where most offices are.

As a resident, it’s extremely disheartening and must be fixed. The Tenderloin has been bad for years, but fentanyl has taken it to the next level.

However, most neighborhoods are different. Most are free from encampments and open-air drug use. Many residents just avoid downtown and some aren’t wise to how bad it really is.

Hence why the city is still so expensive.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse