you probably realized that I was using the jseliger goodbye threads to set an example. We can probably try to analyze the efficacy of my actions in the future, or at least improve the tactics..

[Tried to play the sovereign while the cats (mods) were away (or, narcissistically, "deciding on the exception" -- as in Carl Schmitt's cliche)]

...looks like I "succeeded", whatever that means (improve odds for rna cancer vaccines to become Grothendieck's dream? Manifested a study of mischievous tactics? But once we conceive of the good --while engaging in bad faith tactics -- the scheme fails??)

[OTOH I got paid 0 points net, so does that mean I moved neutrinos in the Russell dichotomy]

Granted, "we" need to work on our temporal logic..

But I do see an interesting mod, in

E(K. G(K `will` mischief in the past) ∧ G(K `manage` good in the future)),

Like you (I) maybe intended to mean, how much mischief, in what sign and proportion in relation to ___?

Or should we go with

E(K. G(K `use` bad faith tactics in the past ) ∧ G(K `do` a modicum of good in the future)),

Or quantum voodoo. the wavefunction has support almost only in the bad faith subspace, but somehow collapses only in the "good". This almost works because bad faith -> good might involve "just" a "relativistic" frameshift