undefined | Better HN

0 pointsulfw1y ago0 comments

Both are quite boring mid-size cities that are heavily overpriced for what they offer. SF is more exciting/prettier yet less safe than SJ.

0 comments

citizenkeen1y ago

The 17th largest city in the US is mid-sized?

jeffbee1y ago

San Jose has this problem where instead of acting like a top 20 city they act like Lubbock.

presentation1y ago

From my perspective living in Asia I’d place it on par with a small rural village

rahimnathwani1y ago

After I moved to Beijing, my first job was at a company opening a network of village banks. The villages had a population of around 1 million. SF has 850k people.

1 more reply

janalsncm1y ago

This is a very funny comment. Small rural villages in China do not have 61 story buildings.

Non-major cities do, but not “small rural villages”.

1 more reply

acchow1y ago

Because the US is so car centric, the largest cities just feel like "mid-size" cities compared it other continents.

A town of 100k in Europe will feel livelier than a metro area of 3 million in the US.

ulfwOP1y ago

It's not even a million population. Certainly would never call San Jose or San Francisco a metropolis.

kentlyons1y ago

The city of San Jose is spread over a huge area (a good fraction of Santa Clara Valley aka Silicon Valley). The downtown area of San Jose which you might think of as a city is rather small.

jeffbee1y ago

The convex hull of San Jose also encloses a ton of junk that is not San Jose because of their unincorporated enclaves and incorporated exclaves. San Jose badly fails my test of whether a city is good or bad based on the geometric complexity of their boundary.

pie4201y ago

yeah, SF is only 800k people, it is pretty small, and the sunset, richmond, parkside, excelcior, and visitation valley neighborhoods are basically single-family subrubs.

Realistically, SF is only a city in it's north-east quadrant. the rest are cute, sleepy suburbs. And I say that as someone who lives in one of those neighborhoods.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

citizenkeen1y ago

The 17th largest city in the US is mid-sized?

jeffbee1y ago

San Jose has this problem where instead of acting like a top 20 city they act like Lubbock.

presentation1y ago

From my perspective living in Asia I’d place it on par with a small rural village

rahimnathwani1y ago

After I moved to Beijing, my first job was at a company opening a network of village banks. The villages had a population of around 1 million. SF has 850k people.

1 more reply

janalsncm1y ago

This is a very funny comment. Small rural villages in China do not have 61 story buildings.

Non-major cities do, but not “small rural villages”.

1 more reply

acchow1y ago

Because the US is so car centric, the largest cities just feel like "mid-size" cities compared it other continents.

A town of 100k in Europe will feel livelier than a metro area of 3 million in the US.

ulfwOP1y ago

It's not even a million population. Certainly would never call San Jose or San Francisco a metropolis.

kentlyons1y ago

The city of San Jose is spread over a huge area (a good fraction of Santa Clara Valley aka Silicon Valley). The downtown area of San Jose which you might think of as a city is rather small.

jeffbee1y ago

pie4201y ago

yeah, SF is only 800k people, it is pretty small, and the sunset, richmond, parkside, excelcior, and visitation valley neighborhoods are basically single-family subrubs.

Realistically, SF is only a city in it's north-east quadrant. the rest are cute, sleepy suburbs. And I say that as someone who lives in one of those neighborhoods.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse