Skip to content
Better HN
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Search
⌘K
undefined | Better HN
0 points
ghusto
1y ago
0 comments
Share
Exactly this. Microsoft did this poorly, so they were forced to allow others to do things poorly too.
0 comments
default
newest
oldest
Macha
1y ago
I guess I don't think that's the sole reason, as I think the incentives would still be in place even if Microsoft authored security software did not run anything in kernel space.
ghusto
OP
1y ago
You mean in terms of third-parties wanting that level of access regardless? I agree, but it would be an easy "no" then.
Macha
1y ago
In terms of Microsoft convincing regulators that they aren't and won't use any OS knowledge or private APIs ever.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse