Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
creata
1y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
But for it to be 100% trustworthy,
you'd
have to express correctness criteria for those simple tasks as formal statements.
0 comments
4 comments · 3 top-level
top
newest
oldest
lanstin
1y ago
· 1 in thread
And most applied maths doesn't seem to worry about proofs much. They have techniques that either work pretty well or blow up.
optimalsolver
1y ago
Bridge collapses are a form of proof validation.
geysersam
1y ago
My intuition is that a regular LLM is
better
att coming up with a correct task description from a fuzzy description than it is at actually solving tasks.
humansareok1
1y ago
There's a lot of automated proof checkers out there. Presumably you would just run any solution from an AI through those.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse