undefined | Better HN

0 pointsimgabe1y ago0 comments

You are responsible for optimizing your own happiness. A company can't and shouldn't do that for you. Unhappy with your job? Find a different one. I don't presume to know what will make you happy and dictate to you how you need to live to achieve that and neither should you presume to do that for me.

Some people are happy focusing on their family. Some people are happy working hard in their career. Some people just want a job to pay the bills and plenty of time to play video games. These are all fine and valid choices and no company is going to optimize for all of them.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

sqeaky1y ago· 2 in thread

It is easy to "find a new job" but things like healthcare, geographic location, and creditworthiness are tied to employment.

If employment were more isolated this argument would still only be superficially reasonable, because we also live in a society with structural sexism and racism and other bigotries. Plenty of people have fewer employment options because of the circumstances of their birth.

Then look at me, I am professional contractor and not the obvious target of any of those bigotries. 16 contracts (often 6 or 12 mo), in the past 20 years. of that maybe 3 weren't complete shitholes. How long is one person supposed to keep making major life changes to search for a job that doesn't abuse them? Because a 1 in 5 hit rate implies some things.

Setting a floor on how shitty companies can be to their employees would a boon to everyone and likely make the whole economy more productive simply by reducing depression by a double digit percentage.

imgabeOP1y ago

> Setting a floor on how shitty companies can be to their employees would a boon to everyone and likely make the whole economy more productive simply by reducing depression by a double digit percentage.

Yes, we do that. It's called "labor laws". There are many of them.

It's a question of agency. If you assign responsibility for your well-being to others, then you're always going to be at their mercy. Sure, there's structural whatevers and bigots and all sorts of things. Some people won't hire you because you remind them of the kid that bullied them in 3rd grade. Whatever. It's still up to you take control of your life. Nobody else is going to do it for you. Every time you try and demand that someone else do it for you, you are going to end up disappointed.

sqeaky1y ago

No need to be so absolute no one is "assign[ing] responsibility for your well-being to others", there are grey areas and gradients and employment is fundamentally full of those.

No one person can be an expert in everything, we live in a society and should act like it. Needing to be an expert in healthcare, hiring processes, finances, and a dozen other topics just to switch jobs is a major barrier to the just switch mentality you are presenting. And I know first hand, I am just switching constantly because it is what I wanted. We should have reasonable baselines and minimums for treatment, and those should shift and get better as we improve society.

> Every time you try and demand that someone else do it for you, you are going to end up disappointed.

Yet there are countries that have better situations for labor than the US?!

Even something as simple as universal healthcare would fix a ton for millions of US people. It would empower worker to switch jobs and employers to lure top talent held by it. Only a hundred or so other countries figured it out, there is no way we could do it here we would only end up disappointed, right?

I pick that as an example, but we could go over many possible topics that aren't blanket assignments of "responsibility for your well-being to others". Consider non-compete clauses, IP transfers, minimum wage and tons of other topics that if they had a minimum floor of decency could allow more freedom the the worker and employer.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse