Today, AI can analyze extreme amounts of data, eliminating this asymmetry and creating a gap with our own capability. How can we maintain some level of 'information obscurity' or processing advantage against the AI? Are there any methods that remain challenging for AI to interpret but are accessible to humans?
I was thinking more like creating "DRM-like" content in obscure copy that might withstand for a while ... shrug
So what I've done is remove my works from the open web and put it behind a login wall. If you want an account, I have to be certain that you're a human being and that you will not proceed to put my work somewhere where it can be scraped by an AI bot.
Which, in practice, means that I have to personally know you. I don't know of any other solution to this problem at this time.
I’m curious if you’re more concerned about the corpus of your work being used in the training of a model, or, parts of your work being analyzed by an existing model? For the former, I suspect copyright laws will eventually come around that afford some protection. But as for having something summarize your work, I sense that no copyright laws would be made for that.
Talldayo said "I really don't think there are any ways to guarantee that AI cannot understand you."
neon_me responded: "hence, we are doomed"
Talldayo responded "I suppose you could have said the same thing about the invention of books"
My comment was in response to that. Talldayo's response seemed a nonsequitor to me because books are providing data to the reader, not trying to collect and understand data from the reader.
