i'm curious, in the beginning, before you had so many users of the app, how did you convince pilots/airlines to install SkyPath before it had enough user-generated turbulence data for its ML model? it almost feels like a chicken-and-the-egg problem: you need enough reports before it's useful around the world at all imaginable air routes, or maybe there's enough air/wind data. interesting stuff!
Any plans to change the Jepp integration? Most of my colleagues don’t use it, too much data displayed at once. I’m not sure of a solution but would love to hear if you guys have any ideas.
Regarding the integration with Jeppesen, we would greatly appreciate hearing more about any issues you encounter and receiving your feedback
I’ve been hearing about statistics for turbulence incidences increasing, and wonder if this type of thing is a contributing factor. With this app you’d get a warning but I wonder if you could do anything about it.
I cannot stand the sound of a hundred belts unclicking all at once the moment the seatbelt sign turns off. Idiots. The presence of a seatbelt across one's lap is the least of the various tortures associated with modern air travel.
It's similar to problems which have been previously caused by a reliance on in cockpit weather data delivered by satellites. At worst it can be 15 minutes out of date and more than one eager light aircraft pilot has flown into the center of a storm cell which wasn't there 15 minutes ago - taking his family with him.
Its only turbulence but worst case scenario with turbulence is still pretty bad - injuries and even deaths are completely possible outcomes.
Or is the steady state simply clear flight paths with continuous adjustments as the clear paths drift?
Try watching/downloading flightradar24 - the sheer number of flights is staggering. Then multiply them by the number of days since you can (without assistance) actually remember hearing about a plane crash.