1. This has been done before Wikileaks and after.

2. Doesn't seem to have made much difference beyond spreading cynicism as it was never appropriately published.

3. This would have been despite Wikileaks.

He repeatedly inferred that Seth Rich was his DNC source even though his emails showed he continued communicating with his "source" long after Seth Rich was found dead (the source was Russian military intelligence). He was also messaging Donald Trump Jr. during that time period.

That's not journalism, that's dishonesty and activism.