He acted in the interests of everyone who doesn't like the US, you could justifiably say the same thing about him acting in China's best interest, or Iran.
Absolute codswallop that you can't hold a government to account else you are criticised for aiding their enemies. Does that mean we should just sit down and take it because it makes us look bad?
I'm the first in line to criticise my government (UK) but that doesn't mean I'm intentionally working in the interests of it's enemies.
Sod off with these bad faith attacks espousing an opinion that no reasonable person could possibly hold.
Reasonable minds can differ here, I don't think it's bad faith to suggest he might have been acting specifically towards Russian interests - if not originally, then later on.
It has never been proven he had some killer stuff on trump and failed to leak it.
Its not his job to selectively withhold information during an election to make demo voters happy.
And trump is basically immune to bad press anyway. What more could you say about him that hasnt been said.
This claim never held water and still fails to.
Wait, Assange or Trump?
Both Snowden and Assange went far beyond "blowing the whistle" in what they leaked and/or solicited.
Where is the punishment for the people commiting the crimes and treason that Snowden and Assange exposed?
