undefined | Better HN

0 pointsm4631y ago0 comments

Isn't 1 in 200 equivalent to .1 in 20?

0 comments

It is. I think their point is “10x fewer” makes sense if you imagine going from a denominator of 20 to 200.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsm4631y ago0 comments

Isn't 1 in 200 equivalent to .1 in 20?

It is. I think their point is “10x fewer” makes sense if you imagine going from a denominator of 20 to 200.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse