Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
m463
2y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
Isn't 1 in 200 equivalent to .1 in 20?
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
bryzaguy
2y ago
It is. I think their point is “10x fewer” makes sense if you imagine going from a denominator of 20 to 200.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse