undefined | Better HN

0 pointscjk22y ago0 comments

I don't understand what you are saying.

I'm saying it is slower on docker due to container startup, pulling images, overheads, working out what incantations to run, filesystem access, network weirdness, things talking to other things, configuration required, pull limits, API tokens, all sorts.

Versus "go run"

0 comments

2 comments · 2 top-level

rfoo2y ago

Wow! You are right! Running go build on host instead of container is 1.16 times faster! A whopping 435ms difference! Amazing!

    /tmp/gitea $ hyperfine -p 'go clean -cache' 'make backend' 'docker run --rm -v $PWD:/build -v $HOME/.go:/go -w /build golang:1.22.3 make backend'
    Benchmark #1: make backend
      Time (mean ± σ):      2.766 s ±  0.021 s    [User: 8.429 s, System: 1.590 s]
      Range (min … max):    2.732 s …  2.800 s    10 runs

    Benchmark #2: docker run --rm -v $PWD:/build -v $HOME/.go:/go -w /build golang:1.22.3 make backend
      Time (mean ± σ):      3.201 s ±  0.034 s    [User: 9.9 ms, System: 7.7 ms]
      Range (min … max):    3.135 s …  3.235 s    10 runs

    Summary
      'make backend' ran
        1.16 ± 0.01 times faster than 'docker run --rm -v $PWD:/build -v $HOME/.go:/go -w /build golang:1.22.3 make backend'

(For incremental build, tested with `hyperfine --warmup 1 'make backend' 'docker run --rm -v $PWD:/build -v $HOME/.go:/go -v $HOME/.cache/go-build:/root/.cache/go-build -w /build golang:1.22.3 make backend'` it's 812.9 ms vs 1.146s.)

immibis2y ago

But usually it's not "considerably". Obviously setting up the container environment takes time but it should be well under a second per build.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse