undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmatthew-wegner1y ago0 comments

Pentax cameras take a different approach with stabilization--rather than stabilize inside lens, which means every lens is shipping its own stabilization solution, they stabilize the sensor itself.

It limits stabilization to two axes, but now any lens is essentially stabilized. And it also lets them do some tricks, since it's so integrated. One is to do sub-pixel sensor shifts for higher res photos, and another is to do astrophotography tracking when GPS data is available.

Much more limited in scope than a full tracking gimbal, but not bad considering it's built into the camera (earlier bodies had a GPS attachment that slotted into the hot shoe connector): https://www.lonelyspeck.com/pentax-k-1-mark-ii-astrophotogra...

0 comments

Espressosaurus1y ago

Most cameras these days--other than the low end and the very high end--have IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization) built in, and then stabilization built into the longer lenses (typically > 100mm). In higher-end/more recent cameras that both IBIS and lens stabilization can work together to improve how effectively the system works. I don't know if it's true of universally, but the recent cameras in Nikon's ecosystem which I'm familiar with use a 5-axis IBIS unit. A quick search suggests the K-1ii and some other Pentax cameras also moved to 5-axis IBIS--probably one of the reasons most brands are claiming 5+ stops in-body these days.

OM-1, formerly Olympus, does has some very cool tricks using the tiny micro 4/3s sensor combined with a sick IBIS unit allowing hand-held astrophotography that the larger companies haven't bothered with.

shagie1y ago

This is also how any IS lenses for film cameras work since moving the film around isn't entirely practical.

Nikon: https://www.nikonusa.com/learn-and-explore/c/products-and-in...

You can see the VR lens element there.

The Canon version: https://www.canon-europe.com/pro/infobank/image-stabilisatio...

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse