I agree. HN's and the tech bubble's bias many people are not noticing is that it's full of engineers comparing GPT-4 to
software engineering tasks. In programming, the margin of error is incredibly slim in the way that a compiler either accepts entirely correct code (in its syntax of course) or rejects it. There is no in between, and verifying software to be correct is hard.
In any other industry where just need an average margin of error close to a human's work and verification is much easier than generating possible outputs, the market will change drastically.
