undefined | Better HN

0 pointsrunako1y ago0 comments

> it's a reaction to Federal Agencies — unelected governmental representatives — unilaterally making their own rules out of the gray areas.

Eliminating Chevron will trade "unelected governmental representatives" who work at Federal Agencies like the FTC with "unelected governmental representatives" who are work for Federal Agencies that are the US Courts. Progress?

0 comments

cryptonector1y ago

> Eliminating Chevron will trade "unelected governmental representatives" who work at e.g. the FTC with "unelected governmental representatives" who are paid by the US Court system. Progress?

Where do you get that from?

Reversing Chevron will mean that Congress will have to work harder to get the regulations that it and the Executive want. If Congress were not disfunctional that would be a very good thing. And heck, reversing Chevron might well function to help Congress function more normally.

runakoOP1y ago

Congress won’t instantly have written laws to cover every regulation currently enforced by the federal government. Reasonably, it could take many years for those gaps to get filled. In the meanwhile, that means the courts are the key decision makers for large areas of government policy.

macintux1y ago

Republicans originally celebrated Chevron because it took regulations out of the courts' hands.

cryptonector1y ago

Did they? I wasn't there. But a reversal of Chevron doesn't necessarily mean that the courts get to do what they like. It may mean that the courts simply get to gut the bureaucratic state and kick the can to Congress -- that what's not forbidden by statute is allowed rather than that the courts act as regulators. There will be lower courts who will want to push their role as regulators, but the SCOTUS seems uninterested in playing that game given its "major questions" doctrine.

It would be very strange for the court to create the major questions doctrine then impanel itself as the ultimate regulator.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsrunako1y ago0 comments

> it's a reaction to Federal Agencies — unelected governmental representatives — unilaterally making their own rules out of the gray areas.

0 comments

cryptonector1y ago

> Eliminating Chevron will trade "unelected governmental representatives" who work at e.g. the FTC with "unelected governmental representatives" who are paid by the US Court system. Progress?

Where do you get that from?

runakoOP1y ago

macintux1y ago

Republicans originally celebrated Chevron because it took regulations out of the courts' hands.

cryptonector1y ago

It would be very strange for the court to create the major questions doctrine then impanel itself as the ultimate regulator.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse