Great find! Does this also apply to a police officer investigating a crime where their spouse is a suspect? Or to a judge presiding over a court case involving themselves?

There's a reason we don't make a police chief investigate their own misconduct.

"It's a perfectly OK thing to do. The person is just the host hardware. There can be multiple threads running on that hardware at the same time. They can run two threads in their brain, one that deals with investigating the case and a seperate one that might or might not did it".

"He didn't just declare himself innocent of misconduct and embezzelment out of self-interest. The independent investigating "thread" must have arrived to an impartial decision".

"In any case, it's not blatant misconduct, you only see it as such. There's no notion of misconduct in nature, it's a made up thing we invented".

How much would you bet to win against me in a card-game if you have to show me all your cards and I show you none?

Rest assured, I will maintain the task to beat you in another container than all the details I need to beat you.

> So? You're talking about the person, which is just the host hardware. There can be multiple threads running on that hardware at the same time in containers.

...what?