he first said that we don't need to monitor anything, just enable debugging when "business metrics" are failing, and then he changed his stance to "polling from time to time". that's just shows that his first take wasn't thoughtful, so I assumed that he never worked in "the field" or worked on smaller projects, as nobody that worked in bigger projects would say that "we don't need CPU/mem/hdd metrics". it's not like hes proposing something novel, that just ridiculous take that needs to be called out

that's logical fallacy, you can work in any place on earth and still be wrong in the subject.

> You can't just weasel out of it by pretending like you didn't start the interaction by calling someone's expertise into question.

why? if his take is bad, then his job or experience doesn't change the outcome. i'm not an expert by any means, but things that hes saying just contradict everything that is standard practice and my own experience. based on that i'm able to say that he doesn't know what he's saying/proposing, and using his "excellent credentials" just make things worse, as it shows that he doesn't have an argument, just wishful thinking