This is one prediction of many possible outcomes.

Independent of the probability of a negative downstream outcome:

1. It is preferable to correct the unwelcome behavior itself, not the acceptable events simply preceding it (that are non-causal). For example, we denounce when a bully punches a kid, not that the kid stood his ground.*

2. We don't want to create a self-fulfilling prophecy in the form of self-censorship.

* I'm not dogmatic on this. There are interesting situations with blurry lines. For example, consider defensive driving, where it is rational to anticipate risky behavior from other drivers and proactively guard against it, rather than waiting for an accident to happen.

The false choice dilemma is dead. Long live the false choice dilemma!