undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjonathankoren2y ago0 comments

You don’t even have to be this conspiratorially minded to believe the NSA is a legitimate suspect here. (For the record, I think literally every intelligence agency on Earth is plausible here.)

You kind of lost the thread when you say, “act against the interests of American citizens and companies”. Bro, literally anyone could be using xz, and anyone could be using Red Hat. You’re only “acting against Americans” if you use it against Americans. I don’t know who was behind this, but a perfectly plausible scenario would be the NSA putting the backdoor in with an ostensibly Chinese login and then activating on machines hosted and controlled by people outside of the US.

Focusing on a specific distro is myopic. Red Hat is popular.

0 comments

3 comments · 2 top-level

cesarb2y ago· 1 in thread

> but a perfectly plausible scenario would be the NSA putting the backdoor in with an ostensibly Chinese login and then activating on machines hosted and controlled by people outside of the US.

There's a term for that: NOBUS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOBUS). It won't surprise me at all if this backdoor can only be exploited if the attacker has the private key corresponding to a public key contained in the injected code. It also won't surprise me if this private key ends up being stolen by someone else, and used against its original owner.

jonathankorenOP2y ago

>It also won't surprise me if this private key ends up being stolen by someone else, and used against its original owner.

And that is exactly why backdoored encryption is bad.

eastern2y ago

100%.

The HN crowd has come a long way from practically hero-worshipping Snowden to automatically assuming that 'state actor' must mean the countries marked evil by the US.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse